Description of typical situation
Many global beef production systems and some dairy and small ruminant production systems have been established on rangelands and pastures that were formerly covered with forest. Such deforested lands, which have become grazing lands are found in a wide array of climates across Latin America and the Caribbean (Neotropics), in Sub-Saharan Africa (RCA, Cameroon), and in Asia (Vietnam, China). In the northern part of South America, Central America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia, semiarid forests (savannahs) are common, while subhumid and humid forests are widespread across the South American continent — for instance, in the Amazon region and in the Pacific flatlands — in sub-Saharan Africa, and in South East Asia. Deforestation of these forests has been considerable and is still continuing, although some jurisdictions have been able to curb the process. Forests may have been cleared for cropland and later on turned into grazing lands due to economic reasons or declining soil fertility, though forests may also have been cleared with the immediate aim to establish rangelands and pasture; alternatively, cattle may have been introduced on cleared land to secure land ownership. Generally, it is difficult to maintain soil fertility on deforested land in these climates due to deficient management and loss of soil carbon after deforestation. The limited soil fertility causes low grassland productivity and low forage quality which subsequently results in low beef and dairy productivity. Rainfall seasonality and extreme climatic events also constrain productivity by limiting forage yields. Access to markets is another limiting factor as commercially oriented grazing systems are often found in regions with relatively limited population densities. Commercialization in local markets is limited, and production, therefore, tends to target markets located far away and for export. Smaller-scale beef and dairy farmers may thus operate at a disadvantage and be relatively poor; these types of producers may keep livestock rather as a way to store capital and to sell quickly for cash in case of an emergency. Once such smaller-scale farmers sell their herds, it can be challenging to rebuild them.
As an example, in Latin America and the Caribbean, grazing systems on deforested land are generally extensive beef production systems. Such beef systems, whether small- or medium-scale, are often market-oriented. Some grass-based dairy production is found. While intensification in the fattening stage, i.e., finishing of animal in feedlots, is being promoted, only a small proportion of beef comes from such feedlots. While potentially leading to lower land requirements and reduced direct GHG emissions per unit of product, the shift to such systems requires more concentrate feed. This may, in turn, accelerate the conversion of pasture and forest to cropland, leading, in turn, to higher climate and biodiversity impacts. In recent years, livestock systems are being developed to restore tree cover, improve grassland productivity, and contribute to carbon capture, soil health, and biodiversity recovery. Such “silvopastoral” systems purposively combine fodder plants, such as grasses and leguminous herbs, with shrubs and trees for animal nutrition, protection, and complementary uses. The trees in the combined system may be fodder trees but can also produce timber or agricultural products, such as fruits or nuts. Such combination of tree and grassland production can be established both in semihumid and dry tropics as long as the species used are adapted to the environmental and soil conditions.
Common environmental issues
The past and present deforestation results in large quantities of carbon lost from soils and aboveground biomass and significant GHG emissions. Deforestation also reduces biodiversity and the replenishment of aquifers. Livestock grazing in grassland regions with unfavorable conditions and low soil fertility carries the risk of overgrazing. Grassland degradation can result as vegetation cover is altered (reduced or even entirely eliminated, or evolving from grass to shrub), and signs of soil erosion appear. This reduces production potential but also the amount of biodiversity, carbon stored in soils, and the replenishment of aquifers (Principles 2, 3 and 4).
Extensive meat production from cattle also has high direct GHG emission intensities due to low animal productivity. Livestock system intensification and, in particular, the rise in beef fattening may reduce these direct emissions but will, on the other hand, increase the use of feeds, such as maize, soy, wheat, and barley. These crops are generally grown on arable land suited for food crops. The resulting competition for land and water between human-edible food and livestock feed production is an important issue associated with the intensification of livestock production in these regions (Principle 1 and 4).
Common animal health issues
This context includes a wide range of grazing ecosystems and regional risks that, together with the different realities regarding infrastructure and veterinary services development, will shape the presence of diseases and disease risks (Principle 1). Thus, in the African savannahs and sub-Saharan areas major transboundary animal diseases (TADs) such as lumpy skin disease, foot and mouth disease (FMD) and peste des petits ruminants (PPR) remain major concerns, contributing both to negative economic impacts by hampering the production and acting as an important obstacle to access to markets. Political commitment supported with adequate budget to implement control-eradication programs are essential to move forward. Vaccination, together with strategies based on zoning, are the best epidemiological approaches to combat the TADs in these areas. The threat of FMD is also extended to Asia, a major TAD affecting-affected the region. On the other hand, most of Central and South America are equipped with good veterinary services and free from major TADs (Principle 2, 7).
Besides the TADs, endemic diseases such as bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, and gastrointestinal parasites will play a role accordingly to the disease burden, with relative importance alongside TADs in countries. Furthermore, zoonoses caused by bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, and rabies can cause major public health threats. Grazing animals are exposed to close interactions with wild animals, thus there are other relevant diseases at the livestock-wildlife-environment interface such as trypanosomiasis, tick-borne diseases, bat transmitted-rabies which emphasize the need for an adequate management plan of the wildlife–livestock coexistence and appropriate biosecurity measures. In addition, other diseases appear associated with this way of production such as poisoning, bloat and hoof/feet disorders. These negatively affect health, and such production traits can have a serious impact on animal welfare (Principle 3, 5).
Common social issues
Limited Access to Land and Resources: Access to grazing land and natural resources is often limited and can lead to conflicts between different user groups, including commercial grazers, small-scale farmers, indigenous communities, and conservation organizations. Commercial grazers may face challenges in securing tenure rights to grazing land, particularly in areas where land tenure is unclear or contested.
Economic Marginalization: Small-scale livestock owners may face economic marginalization due to factors such as fluctuating market prices, high input costs, and limited access to credit and financial services. They may struggle to compete with larger, more financially secure operators and may lack the resources to invest in improving their operations or diversifying their income streams.
Social Exclusion and Discrimination: Certain groups within commercial grazing communities, such as women, indigenous peoples, and ethnic minorities, may face social exclusion and discrimination. They may have limited decision-making power within their communities, face barriers to accessing resources and services, and experience unequal treatment in employment and business opportunities.
Limited Access to Education and Training: Small scale livestock owners, particularly those living in remote or rural areas, have limited access to education and training opportunities. This can constrain their ability to adopt new technologies and practices, improve productivity, and adapt to changing market conditions. Lack of education and training can also perpetuate social inequalities and limit upward mobility within grazing communities.
Gender Inequality: Gender disparities, due to social norms, may exist within commercial grazing systems, with women often facing limited access to land, resources, and decision-making power. They may also be disproportionately burdened by household and caregiving responsibilities, which can restrict their participation in economic activities and community leadership roles.
Cultural Displacement and Loss of Traditional Knowledge: Commercial grazing systems may contribute to the displacement of indigenous communities and the erosion of traditional land management practices and knowledge systems. This can have negative social and cultural impacts, including loss of identity, social cohesion, and resilience to environmental change.